- Research article
- Open Access
Influence of bioaugmentation on biodegradation of phenanthrene-contaminated soil by earthworm in lab scale
© Asgharnia et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014
Received: 26 July 2014
Accepted: 14 December 2014
Published: 24 December 2014
Use of earthworm to eliminate the phenanthrene from the soil (bioaccumulation) is developed as an economical method. Bioaugmentation of microorganism was used for promotion of bioaccumulation by earthworm. The aim of this study was to determine the bioaccumulation or biodegradation of phenanthrene by Eisenia fetida and bacterial consortium in polluted soil.
The amount of 0.4 kg of the polluted soil in the ratio of 10 and 30 mg phenanthrene per kg of dry soil was transferred into each pot. Afterwards, bacteria and earthworms were added to each pot in separate and combination. The samples were kept under field conditions, and the retention concentrations of phenanthrene were analyzed after 8 weeks.
Results showed that the Eisenia fetida was able to significantly remove phenanthrene from the polluted soil samples. Bioaccumulation and bioaugmentation alone have the removal efficiency of 60.24% and 50.3%, respectively. In the combined mode, phenanthrene removal efficiency was 63.81%.
The current study indicated that the use of earthworms, could improve both phenanthrene bioavailability and microbial activity, which led to enhancing removal of carbon-based pollutants.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of more than 100 various chemicals substances formed during the incomplete burning of coal, oil, gas, rubbish and tobacco ,. PAHs are known as the mutagen and carcinogen substance. They are toxic and persistent in the environment ,. Methods based on the techniques used to purify the contaminated soils were divided into three categories: physical, chemical and biological ,. Bioremediation based on the physical and chemical engineering technologies has high energy consumption and therefore their use is expensive, especially when a large volume of surface of soil is contaminated. The physical and chemical interactions of the soil structure are possibly damaged that is unusable for agriculture. A physical remediation method is led to eliminate the pollutants from soil - water composition, which can be used for further refining ,. Advantage of chemical oxidation includes the use of on-site contamination. Due to the relatively low cost for degradation of pollution, the contamination is eliminated. Disadvantages of chemical oxidation are the ability of creating dangerous byproducts and added chemicals (such as hydrogen peroxide, manganese dioxide and iron oxide) which can have a negative impact on soil organisms or chemical composition. The advantages of bioremediation are the possibility of cleaning the site and the lack of relocation and transportation of toxic waste. Ensure that the permanent removal of polluting and combining of this technology to other methods of purification, the survey of producing is mentioned but the disadvantages of bioremediation can be mentioned as following:
The inability of microorganisms to break down all pollutants
Biodegradation process is slower in compared to other methods
Microbiological degradation, bioaccumulation and transformation are the main methods for the remediation of the phenanthrene from the environment ,. Several groups of earthworms, bacteria and fungi are able to partly decompose, co-metabolically oxidize or mineralize the phenanthrene to harmless products ,. Earthworms are generally resistant to many chemicals, including heavy metals and organic pollutants in soil . They are usually able to accumulate the phenanthrene in the body wall by intestinal uptake during the passage of soil via the gut . Several earthworm species have been found to remove heavy metals, pesticides and lipophilic organic micropollutants like the phenanthrene from the soil such as Eisenia fetida, Eisenia Andrei, Eiseniella tetraedra, Pontoscolx corethrurus, Lumbricus terrestris, Lumbricus rubellus, Dendrobaena rubida, Dendrobaena veneta, Aporrectodea tuberculata and Allobophora chlorotica,. Earthworms stimulate and increase microbial activity by creating the favorable conditions for bacteria and improving soil aeration. This can be used to remedy the contaminated sites and can occur on- or off-site, which is facilitation by mixed microbial consortia and/or pure microbial strains and plants . These organisms have an important influence on the distribution and activities of the soil micro flora, also they modify the structures, physical and chemical features of soil and act in the organic matter (O.M) degradation, nutrient cycling, chemical exchange and humidity holding through ingesting, burrowing, and casting activities . During the Vermiremediation process of the soil, the population of earthworms increases for benefiting significantly the soil remediation in several ways included promoting the fragmentation, soil aeration and soil turning and scattering brings. Earthworms accumulate many Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the soil, not only throughout inactive absorption of the dissolved fraction through the body wall, but also by intestinal uptake during the passage of soil through the gut . Castellanos et al. (2013) showed that the earthworm (Pontoscolex corethrurus) can be used in bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil . Monard et al. (2008) found that earthworms (Lumbericus terrestris) could improve atrazine degradation by changing the microbial community structure of indigenous microorganisms and species bioaugmented . Moreover, Butenschoen et al. (2009) showed that earthworms improved the microbial activity and thus mineralization of phenolic compounds .
There are few bacterial strains with the capacity of the degradation of phenanthrene -. Bacteria are capable of degrading hydrocarbons, but when the earthworms are located in the soil, they will improve the ventilation, motivate the microbial action and therefore biodegradation may be enhanced ,. Previous study indicated that, the bioaugmentation was as an effective method to enhance the bioremediation in removal of phenanthrene from contaminated soils ,, but Yu et al. (2005) stated that there was no significant difference between natural attenuation and bioaugmentation in phenanthrene degradation due to the negative interaction between the inoculums and the indigenous microflora .
The objectives of this study were: 1) To determine the phenanthrene removal from contaminated soil by co-existing of earthworm and bacteria; 2) to explore the effect of OM content on the phenanthrene removal efficiency by earthworms and bacteria.
Material and methods
Phenanthrene and acetone were obtained from Aldrich chemical company (USA), with a >98% purity and J. T. Baker (USA) with purity 99.7%, respectively. Solvents used for extractions include the acetone and methanol (Merck, Germany) which were of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade, and other chemicals were of analytical grade.
Experimental set up
The chemical and texture characteristics of the soil
Treatment of experimental design
State if condition
Bacteria (staphylococcus epidermidis + bacillus subtellis)
Earthworm (Eisenia fetida)
For extraction of phenanthrene from the soil, method of 3550B EPA was used with some modification that was previously defined by Sheng-wang et al. (2008) . Soil samples were carefully collected and homogenized. 2 grams of samples were placed in an Erlenmeyer flask and mixed with 10 ml acetone. Subsequently, 2-minute ultrasonic (cleaning, UK) of these samples and magnetic mixture (Hidolf, Germany) were done during1 hour at a velocity of 200 rpm. The sample was purified with the micro filters with a pore size of 0.22 μm. The chemical analysis was performed using the High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC, CECIL 4100, USA) tool having a C18 column with a length of 25 cm, an internal diameter of 4.2 mm, a UV/VIS detector and a mobile phase of methanol, water v/v 80:20), operating at a flow rate of 1 ml/min at a wavelength of 220 nm.
Bacterial counts were done by using the serial dilution method. Initially, 1gr of the soil sample was suspended with 10 ml and sterilized in normal saline to access a dilution of 10−1. Then, 1 ml of this suspension was injected with 9 ml of normal saline. The serial dilution was done up to 10−12. 1 ml of all dilutions was cultivated on nutrient agar (Merck, Germany) by use of pour plate method. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours and then the colony count was performed and reported as the number of colony-forming units per g dry soil (CFU/g) .
For extraction of phenanthrene from the earthworm, the recommendation set by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 1984) was used with some modification that was previously defined by Kelsey et al. . To assess the ability of the phenanthrene removal from the soil, the Eisenia fetida were used through bioaccumulation after separation of the other earthworms from the soil. Initially, the earthworms were washed by using the tap water, then, weighted by using the digital scaling next, placed in the moist filter paper for 24 hours due to the exertion of the gut. After rewashing, killing of earthworms was done by cooling in the refrigerator and then their corpses transferred into the oven at 65°C for 10 minutes. Then 10 ml acetone was added and mixed for 1 hour in the 200 rpm. After that, the purification and chemical analysis of these samples was performed similar to the phenanthrene analysis in soils. The accumulation of phenanthrene was reported by means of the nanogram per gram of body weight of the earthworm.
After collecting data by the use of Excel 2013 and SPSS (version 14.0), the statistical analysis was performed using the design expert (version 7.0) and One-way Anova test.
Results and discussion
Post Hoc Test for phenanthrene removal efficiency
Mean ± SD (removal percentage)
48.93 ± 1.78
55.47 ± 9.11
Bacteria + earthworm
58.73 ± 8.72
16.37 ± 3.69
55.47 ± 9.11
Bacteria + earthworm
58.73 ± 8.72
16.37 ± 3.69
48.93 ± 1.78
Bacteria + earthworm
58.73 ± 8.72
Bacteria + earthworm
16.37 ± 3.69
48.93 ± 1.78
55.47 ± 9.11
Anova for phenanthrene removal efficiency
Sum of squares
The results of the current study indicated that the bacteria and earthworms could effectively cooperate to remove phenanthrene from soils in two approaches: earthworm uptake and enhanced biodegradation. More experiments about the mechanisms of the actuated biodegradation showed that earthworms led to enhance the microbial activity and an increased bioavailability of phenanthrene, that in turn worked synergistically of facilitate the microbial degradation of phenanthrene in soils. The current study supports the use of earthworms, together with microbial degradation technologies, to produce the comprehensive, innovative remediation approach, according to ecological roles in the removal of carbon-based pollutants.
Authors appreciated Iran University of Medical Sciences for financial supports. All authors like to thank to Dr. Masoud Hashemi and Dr. Abazar Pournajaf because of the microbial analysis.
- Karyab H, Yunesian M, Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Ahmadkhaniha R, Rastkari N: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in drinking water of Tehran, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2013, 11(25).Google Scholar
- Kalantary RR, Badkoubi A, Mohseni-Bandpi A, Esrafili A, Baneshi MM, Jorfi S: Modification of phenanthrenes biodegradation with Humic compounds. Soil Sed Cont 2013, 22: 185–198.Google Scholar
- Karyab H, Rastkari N, Nabizadeh R, Nasseri S, Ahmadkhaniha R, Mahvi AH: Determination and source identification of polycyclic aromatics hydrocarbons in Karaj River, Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2014, 92: 50–56. 10.1007/s00128-013-1140-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández-Castellanos B, Ortíz-Ceballos A, Martínez-Hernández S, Noa-Carrazana JC, Luna-Guido M, Dendooven L: Removal of benzo (a) pyrene from soil using an endogeic earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Müller, 1857). Appl Soil Eco 2013, 9: 62–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez PJ, Illman W: Bioremediation and natural attenuation: process fundamentals and mathematical models. John Wiley & Sons; 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scullion J: Remediating polluted soils. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93(2):345–356. 10.1007/s00114-005-0079-5Google Scholar
- Merkl N, Kraft R, Arias M: Effect of the tropical grass Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) stap on microbial population and activity in petroleum contaminated soil. Microbiol Res 2006, 161: 80–91. 10.1016/j.micres.2005.06.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lundstedt S: Analysis of PAHs and their Transformation Product in Contaminated Soil and Remedial Processes. Department of Chemistry Environmental Chemistry, Umeå University, SWEDEN; 2003.Google Scholar
- Hidayat A, Tachibana S: Biodegradation of aliphatic hydrocarbon in three types of crude oil by Fusarium sp. F092 under stress with artificial sea water. J Environ Sci Technol 2012, 5(1):64–73. 10.3923/jest.2012.64.73View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu S, Wu E, Qiu L, Zhong W, Chen J: Effects of phenanthrene on the mortality, growth, and anti-oxidant system of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) under laboratory conditions. Chemosphere 2011, 83: 429–434. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.082View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Z, Jiang H, Li X, Shi Y: Accelerated removal of pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene in freshwater sediments with amendment of cyanobacteria-derived organic matter. J Hazard Mater 2014, 272: 66–74. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mrozik A, Piotrowska-seget Z, Labuzek S: Bacterial degradation and bioremediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon. Pol J Chem 2003, 12(1):15–25.Google Scholar
- Shafiee P, Shojaosadati SA, Charkhabi AH: Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by aerobic mixed bacterial culture isolated from hydrocarbon polluted soils. Iran J Chem Eng 2006, 25(3):73–78.Google Scholar
- Sinha RK, Bharambe G, Ryan D: Converting wasteland into wonderland by earthworms—a low-cost nature’s technology for soil remediation: a case study of vermiremediation of phenanthrenes contaminated soil. Environmentalist 2008, 28(4):466–475. 10.1007/s10669-008-9171-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silvia M, Contreras-Ramos , Alvarez-Bernal D, Dendooven L: Characteristics of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) in phenanthrenes contaminated soil amended with sewage sludge or vermicompost. Appl Soil Ecol 2009, 41: 269–276. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.11.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Contreras-Ramos SM, Alvarez-Bernal D, Dendooven L: Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil amended with biosolid or vermicompost in the presence of earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Soil Biol Biochem 2008, 40: 1954–1959. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.04.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi S: Earthworms and vermicomposting. Indian J Biotechnol 2004, 3(4):486–494.Google Scholar
- Dabke SV: Vermi-remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil. Blacksmith Inst J Health Pollut 2013, 3(4):4–10.Google Scholar
- Belfroid A, Meiling J, Drenth H-J, Hermens J, Seinen W, Vangestel K: Dietary uptake of superlipophilic compounds by earthworms ( Eisenia andrei ). Ecotox Environ Safe 1995, 31(3):185–191. 10.1006/eesa.1995.1061View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monard C, Martin-Laurent F, Vecchiato C, Francez AJ, Vandenkoornhuyse P, Binet F: Combined effect of bioaugmentation and bioturbation on atrazine degradation in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2008, 40: 2253–2259. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.04.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butenschoen O, Ji R, Schaffer A, Scheu S: The fate of catechol in soil as affected by earthworms and clay. Soil Biol Biochem 2009, 41: 330–339. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.11.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yuliani H, Sahlan M, Hermansyah H, Wijanarko A: Selection and identification of polyaromatic hydrocarbon degrading bacteria. World Appl Sci J 2012, 20(8):1133–1138.Google Scholar
- Seo J-S, Keum Y-S, Li QX: Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds. Int J EnvironRes Public Health 2009, 6: 278–309. 10.3390/ijerph6010278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo C, Dang Z, Wong Y, Tam NF: Biodegradation ability and dioxgenase genes of phenanthrene-degrading Sphingomonas and Mycobacterium strains isolated from mangrove sediments. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2010, 64: 419–426. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.04.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu M, Chen H, Tian L, Hu F, Wei Z-G, Li H-X: Role of earthworm in degradation of soil phenanthrene by Pseudomonas putida. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2008, 19(1):218–222.Google Scholar
- Sun H, Li J, Wang C, Wang L, Wang Y: Enhanced microbial removal of pyrene in soils in the presence of earthworms. Soil Sedi Cont 2011, 20: 617–630.Google Scholar
- Nasseri S, Kalantary RR, Nourieh N, Naddafi K, Mahvi AH, Baradaran N: Influence of bioaugmentation in biodegradation of Phenanthrenes-contaminated soil in bio-slurry phase reactor. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 2010, 1(3):199–208.Google Scholar
- Baneshi MM, Kalantary RR, Jafari AJ, Nasseri S, Jaafarzadeh N, Esrafili A: Effect of bioaugmentation to enhance phytoremediation for removal of phenanthrene and pyrene from soil with Sorghum and Onobrychis sativa. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2014, 12(24).Google Scholar
- Yu K, Wong A, Yau K, Wong Y, Tam N: Natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation on biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mangrove sediments. Marine pollution bulletin 2005; 51: 1071–1077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee S, Lee W, Lee C, Kim J: Degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in rhizosphere of grasses and legumes. J Hazard Mater 2008, 153(1–2):892–898. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheng-wang P, Shi-qiang W, Xin Y, Sheng-xian C: The removal and remediation of phenanthrene and pyrene in soil by mixed cropping of alfalfa and rape. Agric Sci China 2008, 7(11):1355–1364. 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60185-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng S, Zhou Q, Cai Z, Zhang Z, Bhorgin AJ: Phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soils by Mirabilis Jalapa L. in agreenhouse plot experiment. J Hazard Mater 2009, 168: 1490–1496. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelsey JW, Slizovskiy IB, Peters RD, Melnick AM: Sterilization affects soil organic matter chemistry and bioaccumulationof spiked p,p-DDE and anthracene by earthworms. Environ Pollut 2010, 158: 2251–2257. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Protection USE, Agency OoSW:Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (phenanthrenes). EPA, Washington, DC; 2008.Google Scholar
- Hickman ZA, Reid BJ: Earthworm assisted bioremediation of organic contaminants. Environ Int 2008, 34: 1072–1081. 10.1016/j.envint.2008.02.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greer LE, Shelton DR: Effect of inoculant strain and organic matter content on kinetics of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degradation in soil. Appl Environ Microboil 1992, 58(5):1459–1465.Google Scholar
- Hunter RD, Ekunwe SIN, Dodor DE, Hwang H-M, Ekunwe L: Bacillus subtilis is a potential degrader of pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2005, 2(2):267–271. 10.3390/ijerph2005020010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhorgin AJ, Uma K: Antimicrobial activity of Earthworm Powder (Lampito mauritii). IntJCurrMicrobiolAppSci 2014, 3(1):437–443.Google Scholar
- Laverty G, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF: The potential of antimicrobial peptides as biocides. Int J Mol Sci 2011, 12(10):6566–6596. 10.3390/ijms12106566View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolters V: Invertebrate control of soil organic matter solubility. Soil Biol Biochem 2000, 31: 1–19.Google Scholar
- Schaefer M, Juliane F: The influence of earthworms and organic additives on the biodegradation of oil contaminated soil. Appl Soil Ecol 2007, 36(1):53–62. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.11.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barré P, McKenzie BM, Hallett PD: Earthworms bring compacted and loose soil to a similar mechanical state. Soil Biol Biochem 2009, 41(3):656–658. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.