Investigation of natural effective gamma dose rates case study: Ardebil Province in Iran
© Hazrati et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 June 2012
Accepted: 20 July 2012
Published: 2 August 2012
Gamma rays pose enough energy to induce chemical changes that may be biologically important for the normal functioning of body cells. The external exposure of human beings to natural environmental gamma radiation normally exceeds that from all man-made sources combined. In this research natural background gamma dose rates and corresponding annual effective doses were determined for selected cities of Ardebil province. Outdoor gamma dose rates were measured using an Ion Chamber Survey Meter in 105 locations in selected districts. Average absorbed doses for Ardebil, Sar-Ein, Germy, Neer, Shourabil Recreational Lake, and Kosar were determined as 265, 219, 344, 233, 352, and 358 nSv/h, respectively. Although dose rates recorded for Germi and Kosar are comparable with some areas with high natural radiation background, however, the dose rates in other districts are well below the levels reported for such locations. Average annual effective dose due to indoor and outdoor gamma radiation for Ardebil province was estimated as 1.73 (1.35–2.39) mSv, which is on average 2 times higher than the world population weighted average.
Natural ionizing radiation is emitted as a result of spontaneous nuclear transformations of unstable radionuclides naturally occurring in the earth’s crust (i.e. terrestrial origin) as well as those coming from outer space into the atmosphere (i.e. extraterrestrial origin). Gamma radiations as electromagnetic rays often accompany with emission of alpha or beta particles from a nucleus. The majority of human exposure to ionizing radiation occurs from natural sources including cosmic rays and terrestrial radiation . Exposure to extraterrestrial origin radiation, galactic cosmic rays and energetic particles from solar particle events depends mostly on geographical characteristics of a place such as altitude, latitude, and solar activity [2, 3]. The interaction of cosmic radiation with atoms in the atmosphere produce a range of radionuclides that can give rise to human exposure by inhalation or by ingestion after their uptake by plants .
Natural radionuclides of terrestrial origin have very long half-lives or driven from very long-lived parent radionuclides, which have been created in stellar processes before the earth formation. Naturally occurring primordial radionuclides mainly include 238U, 235U, and 232Th series and 40 K . Unlike the pollutants with anthropogenic sources (e.g. polybrominated diphenyl ethers) that are introduced into environment through human activity , terrestrial origin radionuclides are naturally present at trace levels in all environmental compartments. Most radionuclides in the uranium and thorium series and 40 K emit gamma radiation, giving rise to exposures from gamma rays outdoor.
Gamma ray accounts for the majority of external human exposure to radiation from all source types due to its high penetration ability . Gamma radiation has sufficient energy to eject one or more orbital electrons from atoms in the human body and hence break chemical bonds through non-thermal process, thus inducing chemical changes that may be biologically important for the normal functioning of body cells. Physical and chemical processes occurring following the radiation exposure involve successive changes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, and whole body levels that may lead to a wide range of health effects varying from simple irritation, radiation-induced cancer, and hereditary disorders to immediate death [2, 8]. Unlike the electromagnetic fields that mostly limited to some specific locations , gamma radiation is ubiquitous. Great variations have been observed in environmental radiation levels and that several national and international studies have been characterized gamma dose rates both in outdoor and indoor environments [10–14]. [3, 15] reports indicate that world population weighted values for external exposure from terrestrial gamma radiation in outdoors, indoors, and that from cosmic rays at sea level are 59, 84, and 30.9 nGy /h. High levels of environmental gamma radiation are expected in Ardebil province, in northwestern Iran, due to high altitude from the sea level and magmatic highlands (i.e. Sabalan Mountain) located in middle of the state. Since there was no comprehensive report on radiation exposure in this area, background gamma dose rates were measured in selected districts of Ardebil province.
Materials and methods
Selection of the measurement sites
Dose rate measurement
Environmental gamma dose rates were measured using an Ion Chamber Survey Meter, FLuke-451b, in 105 locations. The measurements were performed both at 20 and 100 cm above the ground for a period of one hour. A minimum distance of 6 m from buildings was kept for each measurement campaign . A well designed stand was employed to obtain above-mentioned measuring heights. The instrument was calibrated in an Iranian Atomic Energy Agency accredited laboratory using 137Cs prior to gamma dose rate measurement and a calibration factor of 1 was obtained for the dosimeter. Slide of the dosimeter was kept closed during the measurement campaign in order to prevent the effect of other ionizing particles (i.e. alpha and beta) on recorded dose rates.
Calculation of effective absorbed dose rate
HETotal = Total annual effective absorbed dose rate (mSv/y)
HEIn = Indoor annual effective absorbed dose rate (mSv/y)
HEOut = Outdoor annual effective absorbed dose rate (mSv/y)
T = Time in hours (8760 hours for a year)
D In =Absorbed dose rate in indoor (nSv/h)
D Out =Absorbed dose rate in outdoor (nSv/h)
CC = Correction coefficient (0.7 for adult) 
OFIn/Out = Occupancy factor (80% for indoor and 20% for outdoor) 
Average absorbed dose rates (μSv/h) at 20 and 100 cm above the ground for locations monitored
Shourabil Recreational Lake
Estimated annual effective absorbed dose in selected districts of Ardebil province (mSv)
Average dose rate in outdoor (nSv/h)
Average dose rate in indoor (nSv/h)
Outdoor gamma dose rate
On the other hand, gamma dose rates reported for Switzerland, the UK, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and Turkey are lower than the rates measured in this study (Figure 3). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) estimated global dose rate due to cosmic rays and terrestrial gamma radiation to be on average 89 nGy/h. Assuming this dose rate as a normal level, doses quantified in Ardebil province are 2.4 to 4 times higher than worldwide population weighted average. The exact reason for high radiation doses are not known, but might be attributed to geographical, geological, and altitude of cities studied. In order to put in context, the results obtained in this study along with the values reported for some other locations are provided in Figure 3.
Data for 1 have been taken from , 2 from , 3 from , 4 from , 5 from , 6 from , 7 from , 8 from , 9 from , 10 from , 11 from , 12 from , and 13 represents the current study.
Annual effective absorbed dose
Average annual effective dose for Ardebil province was estimated to be 1.73 mSv ranging from 1.35 (for Sar-Ein) to 2.39 mSv (For Germi). Based on the report of UNSCEAR, population weighed average of effective environmental gamma dose rate due to cosmic rays and terrestrial gamma radiation is 0.87 mGy/y. The annual effective environmental gamma dose rates due to indoor and outdoor for Ardebil province (Table 2) are appreciably higher than the values estimated for world average and that people living in Ardebil province receive on average 2 times (ranging from 1.3 to 2.7) higher environmental gamma radiation than the world population weighted average. Highest annual dose rates were observed in Kosar and Germi districts with respective values of 2.4 and 2.2 mSv.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of Ardebil University of Medical Sciences for this project.
- Charles M: UNSCEAR Report 2000: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiol Prot. 2001, 21: 83-10.1088/0952-4746/21/1/609.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toxicological Profile for Ionizing Radiation. 1999, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Toxicological Profile for Ionizing Radiation. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health ServiceGoogle Scholar
- UNSCEAR: REPORT Vol. I Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Annex A: Dose assessment methodologies. 2000, New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiationGoogle Scholar
- Hughes JS, Watson SJ, Jones AL, Oatway WB: Review of the radiation exposure of the UK population. J Radiol Prot. 2005, 25: 493-10.1088/0952-4746/25/4/010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Selvasekarapandian S, Lakshmi KS, Brahmanandhan GM, Meenakshisundaram V: Indoor gamma dose measurement along the East coast of Tamilnadu, India using TLD. Int Congr Ser. 2005, 1276: 327-328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hazrati S, Harrad S, Alighadri M, Hadi S, Mokhtari A, Gharari N, Rahimzadeh S: Passive Air Sampling Survey of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether in Private Cars: Implications for Sources and Human Exposure. Iran J Environ Health Sci & Eng. 2010, 7: 157-164.Google Scholar
- Al-Saleh FS: Measurements of indoor gamma radiation and radon concentrations in dwellings of Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Appl Radiat Isot. 2007, 65: 843-848. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.01.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pollycove M: Nonlinearity of radiation health effects. Environ Health Perspect. 1998, 106: 363-368.Google Scholar
- Ahmadi H, Mohseni S, Shayegani Akmal AA: Electromagnetic fields near transmission line- problems and solutions. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2010, 7: 181-188.Google Scholar
- Al-Ghorabie FH: Measurements of environmental terrestrial gamma radiation dose rate in three mountainous locations in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Environ Res. 2005, 98: 160-166. 10.1016/j.envres.2004.06.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arvela H: Population distribution of doses from natural radiation in Finland. Int Congr Ser. 2002, 1225: 9-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rybach L, Bachler D, Bucher B, Schwarz G: Radiation doses of Swiss population from external sources. J Environ Radiat. 2002, 62: 277-286. 10.1016/S0265-931X(01)00169-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saghatchi F, Salouti M, Eslami A: Assessment of annual effective dose due to natural gamma radiation in Zanjan (Iran). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008, 132: 346-349. 10.1093/rpd/ncn285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tavakoli MB: Annual background radiation in the City of Isfahan. Med Sci Monit. 2003, 9: 7-10.Google Scholar
- Annex B Exposures from Natural Radiation Sources. 2000, New york: United Nation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiationGoogle Scholar
- SCI;. 2011, Available at http://www.amar.org.ir/Upload/Modules/Contents/asset0/jamiat89/jameiat_ardebil89.pdf, accessed in 20/07/2011, Statistical Center of Iran,
- Bouzarjomeheri F, Ehrampoush MH: Bouzarjomeheri F, Ehrampoush MH:Gamma background radiation in Yazd province a preliminary report. Iran J Radiat Res. 2005, 3: 7-20.Google Scholar
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA): Average gamma radiation dose rate for phase2 RIMNET monitoring sites. 2001, Available online at: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/environment/radioact/download/xls/ratb18g.xls, accessed in 26/6/2012.,
- Ahmed JU: High levels of natural radiation Report of an international conference in Ramsar. 1991, IAEA BULLETIN, 2/1991. Available at: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull332/33205143638.pdf,Google Scholar
- Sohrabi M, Ahmed J, Durrani S: High levels of natural radiation. 1990, Ramsar: Proceeding of the 3rd international conference on high levels of natural radiation, 3-7.Google Scholar
- Bahreini Tosi M, Sadeghzedeh Aghdam A: Evaluation of Environmental Gamma in Azarbayzan. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2001, 2: 1-7.Google Scholar
- Bahreini Tousi MT, Oroji MH: An investigation of Gamma radiation in Mashhad and selected sites of suburb. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2000, 2: 117-121.Google Scholar
- Bahreini Tousi MT, Jomehzadeh A: Comparison of environmental gamma radiation of Kerman Province and indoor Gamma Dose rate in Kerman cty Using Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) and RDS-110. Med J Hormozgan University. 2005, 9: 173-180.Google Scholar
- Bozkurt A, Yorulmaz N, Kam E, Karahan G, Osmanlioglu AE: Assessment of environmental radioactivity for Sanliurfa region of southeastern Turkey. Radiat Meas. 2007, 42: 1387-1391. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.052.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hazrati S, Sadeghi H, Amani M, Alizadeh B, Fakhimi H, Rahimzadeh S: Assessment of gamma dose rate in indoor environments in selected districts of Ardebil Province, Northwestern Iran. Int J Occup Hyg. 2010, 2: 47-50.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.