Application of acidic treated pumice as an adsorbent for the removal of azo dye from aqueous solutions: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies
© Samarghandi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 October 2012
Accepted: 11 October 2012
Published: 5 November 2012
Colored effluents are one of the important environment pollution sources since they contain unused dye compounds which are toxic and less-biodegradable. In this work removal of Acid Red 14 and Acid Red 18 azo dyes was investigated by acidic treated pumice stone as an efficient adsorbent at various experimental conditions. Removal of dye increased with increase in contact time and initial dye concentration, while decreased for increment in solution temperature and pH. Results of the equilibrium study showed that the removal of AR14 and AR18 followed Freundlich (r2>0.99) and Langmuir (r2>0.99) isotherm models. Maximum sorption capacities were 3.1 and 29.7 mg/g for AR 14 and AR18, namely significantly higher than those reported in the literature, even for activated carbon. Fitting of experimental data onto kinetic models showed the relevance of the pseudo-second order (r2>0.99) and intra-particle diffusion (r2>0.98) models for AR14 and AR18, respectively. For both dyes, the values of external mass transfer coefficient decreased for increasing initial dye concentrations, showing increasing external mass transfer resistance at solid/liquid layer. Desorption experiments confirmed the relevance of pumice stone for dye removal, since the pH regeneration method showed 86% and 89% regeneration for AR14 and AR18, respectively.
KeywordsAdsorption Equilibrium studies Pumice Azo Dye
Dyes are widely used in many industries such as textiles, dyeing, printing, paper, plastic and leather manufactory. Every year about more than 7×105 tons of different commercial dyes and pigments are produced all over the world, and about 65 - 70% of them are classified (included) into azo compounds [1, 2]. Colored effluents from textile industries are important environmental pollution sources. Such effluents usually contain non-used dyes, as well as several organic and inorganic pollutants [3, 4]. Synthetic dyes, often used in these industries, can be divided into acidic, reactive, direct, basic and other groups.
The Azo dyes have an azo group band (−N=N-) and because of their low cost, variety, solubility and stability are the most common synthetic dyes used for dying [3, 5]. It is estimated that azo dyes constitute over 50% of the total dye production . Without appropriate treatment, the release of such wastewater into the environment is a serious problem for aquatic environment and human health. For this reason, the treatment of colored waste is necessary.
Several methods such as aerobic-anaerobic treatment , advanced oxidation , membrane processes  and zeolite materials  have been used for dye removal from dyestuff effluent. Adsorption is a key process that is used for the removal of pollutants from wastewater for its low cost, easy application and effectiveness . Commercial activated carbon is the most common adsorbent that has been implemented in this process. This product is very effective for removal of pollutants but is expensive . Recently several natural materials such as eggshell and chitosan [11, 12], oxihumolite  and flay ash  have been tested as sorbents. Among these natural materials, pumice which is a volcanic stone has a low weight and a porous structure (up to 85%) and can be found in many regions of the world. Because of its micro-porous structure, pumice has a high specific surface area, which is advantageous since it allows avoiding the preliminary step of calcinations, a high energy cost, and can float in water owing to its low density.
Recently, many researchers have used pumice for removal of cadmium , disinfection by-product , heavy metals  and sulfur dioxide . Due to the several advantages of pumice stone and its accessibility in Iran, the aim of the present work was to investigate its effectiveness for the removal of two azo dyes, Acid Red 14 (AR 14) and Acid Red 18 (AR 18) at various experimental conditions. Since initial pumice had some impurities, showing low sorption capacity (data are not shown) and are also negatively charged , the acidic treated pumice was used in this work. Therefore, the purpose for acidic treatment of pumice was to improve the positive surface charge of adsorbent and improve its sorption capacity.
Materials and methods
Preparation and characterization of the sorbent
Adsorption characterization based on the R L values
Type of process
Chemicals and experiments
Where qe (mg/g) was the amount of dye adsorbed on pumice, C0 and Ce were the initial and equilibrium dye concentrations (mg/L), respectively; V (L) was the volume of solution and M (gram) was the mass of pumice.
By linear plotting of q vs. t0.5, the values of ki and C can be obtained from the slope and the intercept of this plot.
Chemical components of the used pumice (w/w)
Al 2 O 3
P 2 O 5
Fe 2 O 3
Specific Surface Area (by BET method)
Where B1=RT/b1, b1 is the adsorption heat (cal), kt is the equilibrium binding constant (L/g) corresponding to maximum binding energy. By plotting qe vs. ln Ce one can calculate B1 and kt from the slope and the intercept of the curve, respectively. For isotherm study, about 0.5 gram of adsorbent was added to 250 mL of dye solution at different initial dye concentrations. Experiments were carried out at 20°C and 200 rpm for 24 h to ensure achieving equilibrium.
The values of ∆H0 and ∆S0 can be calculated from slope and intercept of the linear plot ln kd versus 1/T.
Mass transfer coefficient
Desorption experiments were conducted to assess the reusability of the used pumice. Two different desorption methods were therefore investigated, the pH and the heating methods. In the heating method, the pumice was added onto 250 mL dye solution (160 mg/L dye) and let until reaching equilibrium. The removal percentage was then calculated. After that the pumice stone was extracted, rinsed with distilled water for several times and heated at 150°C for 6 hours. The pumice stone from this step was added again to 250 mL dye solution (160 mg/L) and let until reaching equilibrium. By comparison of removal percentages before and after heating, desorption yield was determined. In the case of the pH method, the used adsorbent was introduced into 250 mL beaker and then NaOH at various normalities was added. The beaker was shaken at 200 rpm for 30 min and then the desorbed adsorbent was taken, dried and used again to investigate what percentage of adsorbent was regenerated.
Parameters collected from isotherm models
Parameters extracted from kinetic models
Modified pseudo-first order
Modified pseudo-first order
Mass transfer coefficients for various initial dye concentrations
From the above equation, the sorption capacity of pumice in acidic condition would increase. Differences in removal yields between dyes can be ascribed to the molecular weight of dyes, their chemical structure and the number of sulfonate groups. AR18 has a high molecular weight in comparison with AR14. The lower molecular weight of AR14 allowed a more efficient penetration in the internal part of the adsorbent, leading to a higher removal yield than AR18. In addition, a lower number of sulfonate groups as was the case for AR 14 if compared to AR 18 resulted in a lower size and a lower strict hindrance and hence the penetration in the adsorbent was easier. These phenomena can be considered to account for the results obtained from equilibrium study and desorption experiment as seen below.
As shown on Figure 1 and Table 2, the pumice adsorbent showed an irregular structure after modification. The irregular structure is responsible for increasing in dye sorption capacity. In addition, pumice stone shows smaller pore structure after treatment by HCL. The initial specific surface of pumice stone was 28 m2/g and increased to 54 m2/g after acidic treatment.
AR14 has a low molecular weight and hence can penetrate into the internal part of pumice adsorbent, in agreement with previous results recorded using fly ash as adsorbent . In addition, previous results recorded using activated carbon prepared from Poplar wood , which displayed a high specific surface area (385m2/g) but a low porosity, showed lower yield and rate of removal of AR18, if compared to the present results obtained on pumice stone. It should be most likely related to the high porosity of pumice stone, showing adsorption not only at the surface, but also in the internal part of the sorbent.
Removal yields increased almost linearly for increasing initial dye concentrations (Figure 3), which can most likely be attributed to increasing driving force for increasing initial dye concentrations . Irrespective of the initial dye concentration, higher removal yields were recorded for AR14, if compared to AR18. This phenomenon can be described by large number of mere sites for adsorption of dye at initial stage and with time elapse, and owing to the repulsive forces between sorbate and bulk phase, the occupation of the remaining sites became more difficult to dye molecules . In addition and based on isotherm study described thereafter, due to the higher affinity of AR14 if compared to AR18, higher removal rates were observed for the former at initial sorption stage.
A low temperature was therefore more suitable for AR14 and AR18 removal, showing that the adsorption was exothermic in nature. An escape of dye molecules from the solid surface to the solution for an increment in temperature can account for this behavior.
Fitting of obtained data onto three isotherm model show the removal of AR 14 and AR 18 follow Freundlich (r2>0.99) and Langmuir (r2>0.99) isotherm model. Maximum sorption capacities were 29.7 and 3.125 mg/g for AR 18 and AR 18, respectively; according to Langmuir isotherm constant. The high value of Kf was observed for AR 14 rather than AR 18, showing high affinity of AR 14 onto pumice stone. The value of Freundlich constant (n) was 5.4 and 1.4 for AR 18 and AR 14, respectively; showing the favorable nature of present sorption process. Removal of AR14 by three soils, namely GSE17200, GSE1201 and DG06 has been studied by Baocheng et al. , and showed that AR14 removal followed a Freundlich isotherm model. Maximum capacities of DG06, GSE17200 and GSE17201 were 1.3, 0.98 and 0.83 (mg/g) respectively, namely below that of pumice for AR14 (3.125 mg/g). AR18 removal was previously investigated using activated carbon derived from Poplar wood . The Kf value and maximum sorption capacity were 1.5 and 3.9 (mg/g) respectively, namely significantly lower than those obtained in this work using pumice stone, 12.17 and 29.7 (mg/g) respectively.
It is clear from Table 4 that removal of AR18 and AR14 followed Intra-particle diffusion (r2>0.98) and pseudo-second order (r2>0.99) kinetic model, respectively. However, regression of intra-particle diffusion model did not pass through the origin, showing that it was not the rate-determining step. It can also be observed, that for both dyes similar values were observed for calculated and experimental qe.
The values of ∆H0 and ∆S0 for AR14 were found to be −2698 (kJ/mol) and −9.56 (kJ/mol.K), respectively; while for AR18 they were −3165.88 (kJ/mol) and −11.35 (kJ/mol.K), respectively. The negative value of enthalpy change (∆H0) for both dyes demonstrated that adsorption of AR14 and AR18 onto the present medium was exothermic in nature. The negative values of ∆S0 for both dyes indicated a decrease in the fortuitousness of adsorption at the solid/liquid interface. On the other hand, Gibbs free energy (∆G0) for AR14 and AR18 were found to be in the ranges 124.9- 494.7 and 191.3-667.4 for temperatures in the range 293–333 K, respectively. The positive values of the Gibbs free energy for both dyes indicated that sorption of AR14 and AR18 onto acidic treated pumice were not thermodynamically spontaneous.
For both dyes the values of external mass transfer coefficient decreased for increasing initial dye concentrations. Increasing values of kmtc can be related to increasing external mass transfer resistance at solid/liquid layer. The result of external mass transfer coefficient for both dyes was in the order of 10-3-10-4, in agreement with values of order of magnitude 10-4 found in the literature [23, 24].
Desorption experiments are needed to investigate the economic feature of adsorption. As shown in Figure 4, dye removal was low at high pH, which demonstrated that desorption can be done at alkaline pH. Heating the used adsorbent is another way to perform desorption. In this work, both methods were investigated. By heating method, about 63% and 76% regeneration was observed for AR14 and AR18, respectively. High regeneration of pumice for AR18 can be ascribed to the low affinity of AR18 (Kf=12.17) onto pumice surface and the release of SO3- from the surface of the adsorbent. By pH method, the adsorbed regeneration percentages were 64%, 72% and 86% for AR14 and were 65%, 71% and 89% for AR18 for 1, 1.5 and 2 N NaOH, respectively. Resulting from pH increase, the surface of the adsorbent bombed by OH- ions led to the extraction of SO3- and H+ from the surface of the adsorbent. In addition, high OH- ion concentrations increased the driving force of others ions to be adsorbed on the surface of the medium.
From the above comments, it can be concluded that regeneration of pumice can be efficiently done by the heating method.
The authors thank Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for financial supporting of present work.
- Huang M, Xu C, Wu Z, Huang Y, Lin J, Wu J: Photocatalytic discolorization of methyl orange solution by Pt modified TiO2 loaded on natural zeolite. Dyes Pigments. 2008, 77 (2): 327-334. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2007.01.026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeni J, Kanmani S: Solar nanophotocatalytic decolorisation of reactive dyes using titanium dioxide. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2011, 8 (1): 15-24.Google Scholar
- Shookohi R, Vatanpoor V, Zarrabi M, Vatani A: Adsorption of acid red 18 (AR18) by activated carbon from poplar wood: kinetic and equilibrium study. E J Chem. 2010, 7 (1): 65-72. 10.1155/2010/958073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehrampoush MH, Moussavi GR, Ghaneian MT, Rahimi S, Ahmadian M: Removal of methylene blue dye from textile simulated sample using tubular reactor and tio2/uv-c photocatalytic process. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2011, 8 (1): 35-40.Google Scholar
- Baocheng Q, Jiti Z, Xuemin X, Chunli Z, Hongxia Z, Xiaobai Z: Adsorption behavior of Azo Dye C. I. Acid Red 14 in aqueous solution on surface soils. J Environ Sci. 2008, 20 (6): 704-709. 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62116-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fu Z, Zhang Y, Wang X: Textiles wastewater treatment using anoxic filter bed and biological wriggle bed-ozone biological aerated filter. Bioresour Technol. 2011, 102 (4): 3748-3753. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yasar A, Ahmad N, Amanat A, Khan A, Yousaf A: Decolorization of Blue CL-BR dye by AOPs using bleach wastewater as source of H2O2. J Environ Sci. 2007, 19 (10): 1183-1188. 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60193-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Liu C, Chu KH, Suen S: Removal of cationic dye methyl violet 2B from water by cation exchange membrane. J Membrane Sci. 2008, 309 (1–2): 239-245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zendehdel M, Kalateh Z, Alikhani H: Efficiency evaluation of NaY zeolite and TiO2/NaY zeolite in removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2011, 8 (3): 265-272.Google Scholar
- Samadi MT, Rahmani AR, Zarrabi M, Shahabi E, Samie F: Adsorption of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution by sugar beet bagasse-based activated charcoal. Environ Technol. 2009, 30 (9): 1023-1029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehrampoush MH, Ghanizadeh G, Ghaneian MT: Equilibrium and kinetics study of reactive red 123 dye removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on eggshell. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2011, 8 (2): 101-108.Google Scholar
- Crini G, Badot PM: Application of chitosan, a natural amino polysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: a review of recent literature. Prog Poly Sci. 2008, 33 (4): 399-447. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.11.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Janos P, Sedivy P, Ryznarova M, Grotschelova S: Sorption of basic and acid dyes from aqueous solutions onto oxihumolite. Chemosphere. 2005, 59 (1–3): 881-886.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Janos P, Buchtova H, Ryznarova M: Sorption of dyes from aqueous solutions onto fly ash. Water Res. 2003, 37 (3): 4938-4944.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panuccio MR, Sorgona A, Rizzo M, Cacco G: Cadmium adsorption on vermiculite, zeolite and pumice: Batch experimental studies. J Environ Man. 2009, 90 (1): 364-374. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bekaroglua SSK, Yigit NO, Karanfilb T, Kitis M: The adsorptive removal of disinfection by-product precursors in a high-SUVA water using iron oxide-coated pumice and volcanic slag particles. J Hazard Mater. 2010, 183 (1–3): 389-394.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moraci N, Calabro PS: Heavy metals removal and hydraulic performance in zero-valent iron/pumice permeable reactive barriers. J Environ Man. 2010, 91 (11): 2336-2341. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozturk B, Yildirim Y: Investigation of sorption capacity of pumice for SO2 capture. Proc Saf Environ Protect. 2008, 86 (1): 31-36. 10.1016/j.psep.2007.10.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ersoy B, Sariisik A, Dikmen S, Sariisik G: Characterization of acidic pumice and determination of its electrokinetic properties in water. Powder Technol. 2010, 197 (3): 129-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azizian S, Bashiri H: Adsorption kinetics at solid/solution interface: Statistical rate theory at initial times of adsorption and close to equilibrium. Langmuir. 2008, 24 (3): 11669-11675.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azizian S: Kinetic models of sorption: a theoretical study. J Colloid Interfac Sci. 2004, 276 (1): 47-52. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.03.048.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuo C, Wu C, Wu J: Adsorption of direct dyes from aqueous solutions by carbon nanotubes: Determination of equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics parameters. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 327 (4): 308-315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsai WT, Yaung CC, Ing CH, Feng CC: Adsorption of acid dyes from aqueous solution on activated bleaching earth. J Colloid Interfac Sci. 2004, 275 (1): 72-79. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.01.072.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacKay G, El-Geundi MS, Nassar MM: Adsorption of dyes onto bagasse pitch during the external transport processes. Water Res. 1998, 22 (3): 1527-1535.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.